Sunday, September 04, 2005

The Myth of Compassionate Conservatism

I think this week we all learned that where GWB is concerned, 'compassionate conservatism' does not exist. I never really believed that he was being honest when he ran on the 'compassionate conservative' platform. But I was absolutely horrified by the way he proved me right.

For four days after the hurricane we all watched helplessly as the people in New Orleans screamed and begged for help. For four days, none arrived. For four days, peopled waded through foul sewage infested water. For four days, people waited in inhuman conditions. For four days, people starved. For four days, people thirsted. For four days, people were raped and shot at. For for days, people screamed and cried for help. And for four days, people died. Needlessly.

And what was their president doing? Playing the guitar while New Orleans drowned bemoaning the loss of Trent Lott's summer home. Poor Mr. Lott.

And it wasn't until the Congressional Black Caucus held a press conference, quoted scripture and demanded 'compassion' from our conservative president that he flew to New Orleans, had a few well chosen photo ops, hugged a couple of starving black people and vowed as God as his witness, they wouldn't go hungry for much longer.

What of his 'culture of life?' Or does that only extend to unborn babies and brain dead white women in battleground states?

I think this past week shows that 'compassionate conservativism' as embraced by gwb and his neocon crew is a myth. If they were really compassionate or even the slightest bit human, it wouldn't have taken four days to get help to the people in New Orleans.

They are the first to stand up and scream that liberals 'hate America first,' but I think that neocons like gwb and those of his ilk, simply hate Americans, for I can find no other reason as to why they would allow people to go on suffering for days and days.

Compassionate conservatism is dead.

3 Comments:

At 12:50 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Very well put. One question though... I have been watching the news daily and I haven't heard anything about people being raped. Where have you heard this? I know several newscasters have said that the people were not hostile and they were waiting as patiently as they could for help to arrive. It is a shame how help arrived within two days for Tsunami victims, and troops were able to arrive in Iraq within 24hrs but it took 5 days for help to arrive to victims in our own country. Bush should be ashamed of himself. As far as all the negative images and stories being told by the media , I'm not buying it, they want us to believe that the people down there are dangerous and out of control just so they can have an excuse as to why it took them so long to get there. Jesse Jackson said that he was down there and it was not dangerous. So where are all these stories coming from?

 
At 1:17 PM, Blogger liberalprogressive said...

I did hear about rapes on CNN, and also if you go to HuffingtonPost.com they have many articles about the violence at the convention center in New Orleans and at the Superdome.

The stories are coming from the people who were there.

I'm not saying that everyone there is out of control, but in any situation like this, there are going to be a small number of people who behave badly. And that is certainly no excuse for withholding aid to the larger number of people who need help.

You do make some good points, though about people just grouping needy people together as dangerous to excuse their not helping them.

 
At 12:10 AM, Blogger CW FISHER said...

Actions.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

« Liberal Blogs »
Blogarama - The Blog Directory this is a Proud Liberal Site